Borla 17-20 Mazda CX-5 2.5L AT AWD 4DR 2in S-Type Rear Section Exhaust

Borla 17-20 Mazda CX-5 2.5L AT AWD 4DR 2in S-Type Rear Section Exhaust

Marsoni

M251S

$535.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Borla 17-20 Mazda CX-5 2.5L AT AWD 4DR 2in S-Type Rear Section ExhaustSKU: 11969 UPC: 808422119696 Borla 2017 2021 Mazda CX 5 2. 5L AT AWD FWD 4DR 2. 5in S Type Axle Back Exhaust The Borla 11969 S Type axle back exhaust system delivers the signature Borla Sound of Power for 2017 2021 Mazda CX 5 models with 2. 5L engines, automatic transmission, FWD or AWD, 4 door. This direct bolt on replacement for the factory rear muffler boosts power and torque, enhances fuel economy, and provides a drone free driving experience with

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Borla 17-20 Mazda CX-5 2.5L AT AWD 4DR 2in S-Type Rear Section Exhaust orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Borla 17-20 Mazda CX-5 2.5L AT AWD 4DR 2in S-Type Rear Section Exhaust ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Borla 17-20 Mazda CX-5 2.5L AT AWD 4DR 2in S-Type Rear Section Exhaust, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Borla 17-20 Mazda CX-5 2.5L AT AWD 4DR 2in S-Type Rear Section Exhaust in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I first bought this sunscreen in May 2022, and I got it again now, June 2024. The product is different now and some of the changes are noticeable in the pictures I've included: new look and shape to the bottle, weighs a bit less (great for TSA if you travel), the ingredients are slightly different. What you can't see in the photos is that it definitely smells better than it did before and it goes on your skin clearer than it used to; it would make me look like a ghost before, whereas now, it just makes my face shiny. It feels kind of dry when you apply it, definitely non-greasy. It still holds up great while sweating and swimming. And it definitely does its job of protecting from sunburns. Overall, I'm happy with the changes they've made and I would recommend it to anyone looking for durable mineral sunscreen for sensitive skin.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 17, 2024

Verified Purchase

CNC106

Bozeman, US

★★★★★ 5

No stinging eyes for 6 yrs

Size: 4 Ounce (Pack of 1)

Out of all the sunscreens I've tried (zinc or otherwise) Alba Botanica is the only one that has not stung my eyes. Been using continuously for around 6 years. 7-8 years ago tried Neutrogena zinc sunscreen. It didn't sting initially but started stinging 1 year after continuous use. And Alba Botanica zinc Spf 50 does leave a white cast, just less intense than Neutrogena zinc.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2026

Verified Purchase

Nikki C.

Draper, US

★★★★★ 1

Not described correctly

Size: 4 Ounce (Pack of 1)

The bottle says NO WHITE MARKS, but it does exactly have white marks..its hard to makeup on after that.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 26, 2026

Verified Purchase

RaevenS

Birmingham, US

★★★★★ 3

Great on paper, but milky

Size: 4 Ounce (Pack of 1)

Based on my research I think it's one of the best physical sunscreens. Highest active ingredient percent and good price. It is quite white and harder to melt in and I still tan quite deeply.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 22, 2025

Verified Purchase

Pam

Los Angeles, US

★★★★★ 2

Too thick and Difficult to Spread

Size: 4 Ounce (Pack of 1)

I’ve been using this sunscreen for several years. It was getting a good rating from Environmental Working Group in terms of being healthy for the skin. However, I finally gave up on it because it is so thick and difficult to spread. There are other healthy sunscreens that are not so thick and chalky.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2025